Vox Hortus

Suburbia! Where we cut down the trees and name the streets after them

Richard Dawkins on NPR March 30, 2007

Filed under: Books, Evolution — Dharma @ 5:24 pm

Terry Gross interviews Richard Dawkins on his bestseller “The God Delusion.” I have long been a fan of Dawkins’ “The Ancestor’s Tale” even as I am still in the process of reading; it’s a wicked-complicated but thoroughly enjoyable yarn.

I understand where Dawkins is coming from in his assertion that religion and science really are about the same thing. Clearly at least to me, the question of the origins of life have a single correct answer. It’s been wonderfully harmonious to, for a time, compartmentalize the beliefs of religion and the assertions of science as being true in their own realms; it’s highly unlikely that reflects the truth. That’s not to say that God and science cannot coexist, just that neither exists in a vacuum.

Dawkins lays waste to rumors of Einstein’s religious leanings. Conversely, we know that Darwin had come from a place of studying theology before the HMS Beagle. I maintain that neither of those facts has any bearing on either the discussion at hand or the works of each man. And I continue to be slightly uncomfortable with Dawkins’ style: I’m irritated that while he asserts the truth of science, a truth mitigated by empirical evidence and unbiased observations, he is dramatic and condescending. I do not believe this advances his message, which I think otherwise has great merit.

I want to be excited about his message; I believe it’s a compelling argument and important discussion. Time and again, however, I watch his lectures and hear his interviews and am turned off by the often apparent spiteful agenda. This interview on NPR has Dawkins in one of his more diplomatic moods. It’s an enjoyable overview of ‘The God Delusion’.

The link directs to NPR where you can also hear part II of the discussion, an interview with geneticist and evangelical Christian, Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Project.

Richard Dawkins Explains ‘The God Delusion’ here.

 

Treehugger March 29, 2007

Filed under: Books, Botany, Horticulture — Dharma @ 6:31 pm

The first tree I ever loved was Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree. By the end of the story, I was pretty clear that the man was a villain and the tree was elevated to the status of a beloved martyr. I reread the story and hoped each time that he would make better choices, be able to support himself, not make the tree pay for his poor planning. Each time he showed up with his sad story of lack and later his advanced age and desire to be a sailor, I knew the tree would offer itself up again and each time it was my hero, the man my nemesis.

Other things strike me about the book today: how the initials carved into the tree’s trunk stay at the base of the tree. Good job Silverstein: trees grow from the top not the bottom, and mars on a trunk remain at essentially the same height over a tree’s life. And now I wonder what kind of tree it was: Ash maybe? The tree’s identity has always been a function of my favorite tree at the moment. It was a Jacaranda, then a Magnolia. Now I think it might be a Ficus, but that’s me trying to be botanicly accurate.

My second love affair with a tree was in fifth grade. We discovered silk worms in the grass outside our classroom and set our hands to ranching them. They were herded into margarine containers and fed the leaves of the mulberry trees that grew in front of the school. The silkworms interested me greatly, but I also noticed the graceful shape of the leaves that we pulled off and offered to our larval charges. We folded them into tiny booklets and orgami notes to pass in class. Long after the silkworms went on their way (okay fine, they died), I admired the mulberry trees that grew around Westport Elementary. I believed that I alone appreciated their beauty and ability to feed the worms. Perhaps The Giving Tree was a mulberry.

I‘ve loved a number of trees since then, felt a private fondness for them, worried about their wellbeing. For a long time, my infatuation was unmitigated by any real knowledge about them. I didn’t know which ones were which, I knew nothing about their cultural needs. My last love that was cloaked in ignorance was the Jacaranda which grows to majestic heights and profiles in Southern California, blanketing the streets and sidewalks with purple flowers that pop when crushed. They are ethereal sentries in the smoggy city where few old trees persist. I would learn they are also ethereal plumbing and foundation vandals.

At the dawn of my entrance into horticulture, I met a Brachychiton. It grew in the middle of our backyard with a grey, bottle-shaped trunk that shaded into bright green moving up from ground level. In the Spring it set coral colored, trumpet shaped flowers and its maple-like leaves arrived nearly two months later. I remember being confounded by its habit but charmed by its beauty. From the backyard it towered over our tiny house, visible from the street, visible from nearly a block away. From 900 miles away now, I sometimes check Google Maps to see if it’s still there. (It is.)

The things I’ve done for love:

  1. Pulled the markers off trees destined for the chipper at a public park
  2. Yelled out the window at kids playing too close to the newly planted, whiplike city street trees
  3. Watered new street trees on other people’s blocks
  4. Bent down in business attire to clear away an overabundance of mulch around a newly planted tree in public space
  5. Cautioned construction crews not to cut or compress exposed tree roots
  6. Haunted the city arborist during an outbreak of Fusarium in Canary Island Palms
  7. Glared at homeowners removing trees
  8. Rolled my eyes at landscape clients whose tree selections were overly informed by practicality

Any tree is better than none, but some trees stay with me: the ginkos in autumn at the LA Arboretum, cloaks of shocking yellow above a carpet of blue Senecio; a lone white oak on open savanna; the dark, roomy shelter under a Camperdown elm. I write papers about the metabolic pathways of plant hormones, and that’s awe inspiring to be sure. It’s incredible to sit under a tree and be mindful of the biosynthetic empire within. Perhaps it’s not quite the nirvana of a grove of quaking aspen on a windy day, but it’s close.

 

Reading March 27, 2007

Filed under: Books, Horticulture — Dharma @ 6:19 am

Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies
Jared Diamond

I picked this up for the agricultural history but was quickly taken with the excellent writing and comprehensive world history from ~13,000 years ago to present.

Flower Confidential
Amy Stewart

This is a look at the floriculture industry in the US, Latin America and Europe. It was eye-opening, and my single complaint is that for as much as the author talked about photo ops, the only photos are at the chapter openings with no descriptive information.